初中教育阶段流动儿童心理健康影响因素队列研究

李龙; 宋月萍; 胡以松

doi:10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2019.09.006

初中教育阶段流动儿童心理健康影响因素队列研究

doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2019.09.006

1.
100191 北京, 北京大学公共卫生学院
2.
100872 北京, 中国人民大学人口与发展研究中心
3.
100872 北京, 中国人民大学中国调查与数据中心

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目 15BRK036

中国博士后科学基金资助项目 2019M650398

详细信息

通讯作者:
胡以松. E-mail: huysnsrc@ruc.edu.cn

中图分类号: R181
计量
- 文章访问数: 418
- HTML全文浏览量: 169
- PDF下载量: 45
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-05-14
- 修回日期: 2019-07-16
- 刊出日期: 2019-09-10

Cohort study on determinants of mental health of migrant adolescents in junior high schools

1.
School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
2.
Center for Population and Development Studies, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
3.
National Survey Research Center, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China

Funds:

China National Social Science Foundation of China Funded Project 15BRK036

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Funded Project 2019M650398

More Information

Corresponding author: HU Yi-song. E-mail: huysnsrc@ruc.edu.cn

摘要

摘要: 目的分析初中教育阶段流动儿童心理健康的总体状况、变动趋势以及影响因素。方法各期资料均来源于中国教育追踪调查。2013-2014学年基线调查采用分层次、多阶段、与规模成比例的概率抽样方法，全国初中教育阶段10 279名七年级学生进入调查队列，2014-2015学年一期追访到9 449人，选取其中1 645名流动儿童作为分析对象。基于调查问卷中的学生自报心理健康量表，采用t检验方法和多元线性回归模型开展流动儿童心理健康的单因素分析和多因素分析。结果 1 645名初中教育阶段流动儿童的基线心理健康总体得分为(8.33±3.31)分，比非流动儿童得分(8.03±3.17)高，随时间推移到追踪期升高至(8.60±3.79)分，43.3%的被调查者更高频地出现消极心理状态。性别、认知水平、居住方式、兄弟姐妹数量以及学校排名等对心理健康总体得分产生的影响差异具有统计学意义(均有P < 0.05)。结论流动儿童心理健康状况相对于非流动儿童更加脆弱，且有持续恶化趋势。流动儿童中的女性、认知能力较弱者、不与父母双方同住者、非独生子女以及所在学校排名中等及以上者心理健康状况偏差。
- 流动儿童 /
- 心理健康 /
- 队列研究
Abstract: Objective To analyze the status, changing trends and determinants of mental health of migrant adolescents in junior high schools. Methods All of the data came from China Education Panel Survey (CEPS). CEPS baseline survey was conducted during the 2013-2014 school year by using a stratified multistage probability sampling design. 10 279 nationally representative adolescents from the seventh grade in junior high schools were enrolled in the base school year of data collection and 9 449 participants were followed up at the second wave of data collection during the 2014-2015 school year. Our analytic sample (n=1 645) included all the migrant adolescents who had valid data on mental health. Based on CEPS self-reported mental health scale, t-test method and multivariate linear regression model were used to examine the determinants of mental health of migrant adolescents by performing univariate analysis and multivariate analysis. Results The baseline mental health score of migrant adolescents was (8.33±3.31), higher than that of non-migrant adolescents, and significantly increased to (8.60±3.79) in the follow-up school year. 43.3% of participants had negative mental status at higher frequency as time went on. Sex, cognitive skills, co-residence arrangements, numbers of siblings and school rankings were significant influencing factors for mental health score of migrant adolescents. Conclusions The mental health status of migrant adolescents are more vulnerable than that of non-migrant adolescents and continue deteriorating. Among migrant adolescents, female, those with weak cognitive skills, those who do not live with both parents, those who are not only children and those in schools ranking medium and above are more likely to have a poor mental health state.
- Migrant adolescents /
- Mental health /
- Cohort Study

HTML全文

表 1 初中教育阶段流动儿童心理健康状况影响因素的多因素分析

Table 1. Multivariate analysis of factors influencing mental health of migrant adolescents in junior high schools

变量	β(95% CI)值	s_x值	P值
个体因素
性别
女性	1.00
男性	-0.46(-0.85~-0.07)	0.20	0.019
认知水平	-0.24(-0.47~-0.01)	0.12	0.040
学业期望
非高等教育	1.00
高等教育	-0.46(-0.96~0.05)	0.26	0.075
家庭因素
居住方式
与父母双方同住	1.00
不与父母双方同住	0.65(0.14~1.16)	0.26	0.012
兄弟姐妹数量
非独生子女	1.00
独生子女	-0.44(-0.84~-0.04)	0.20	0.030
经济条件
中等以下	1.00
中等及以上	-0.07(-0.58~0.44)	0.26	0.784
家庭以外因素
班级排名
中等以下	1.00
中等及以上	0.42(-0.04~0.89)	0.24	0.075
好友数量	-0.01(-0.02~0.00)	0.01	0.159
学校排名
中等以下	1.00
中等及以上	0.58(0.15~1.00)	0.22	0.008

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(15)

[1]	吕利丹, 程梦瑶, 谭雁潇, 等. 我国流动儿童人口发展与挑战(2000-2015)[J]. 青年研究, 2018, (4): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QNYJ201804001.htm Lv LD, Cheng MY, Tan YX, et al. The development and challenges of migrant children population in China: 2000-2015[J]. Youth Studies, 2018, (4): 1-12. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QNYJ201804001.htm
[2]	Stevens GWJM, Vollebergh WAM. Mental health in migrant children[J]. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2008, 49(3): 276-294. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01848.x.
[3]	张坤. 我国儿童心理弹性研究的回顾与展望[J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 2015, 33(4): 58-64. DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2015.04.009. Zhang K. Retrospect and prospects of researches on children's resilience in China[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), 2015, 33(4): 58-64. DOI: 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2015.04.009.
[4]	肖丹琼, 魏乾伟, 张翠红, 等. 北京市石景山区2564例2~16岁流动儿童伤害现况调查[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2016, 20(7): 675-678. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.07.008. Xiao DQ, Wei QW, Zhang CH, et al. Investigation on the status of injuries among 2564 migrant children aged 2-16 years old[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2016, 20(7): 675-678. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.07.008.
[5]	赵丹, 陈忠伟, 欧阳斌发, 等. 深圳市南山区0~18岁流动儿童与本地儿童伤害急诊监测结果比较分析[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2011, 15(5): 412-414. http://zhjbkz.ahmu.edu.cn/article/id/JBKZ201105017 Zhao D, Chen ZW, Ouyang BF, et al. Analysis of data emergency-room-based injury surveillance of floating and native children aged 0-18 in Nanshan District of Shenzhen[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2011, 15(5): 412-414. http://zhjbkz.ahmu.edu.cn/article/id/JBKZ201105017
[6]	戴逸茹, 李岩梅. 居住流动性对心理行为的影响[J]. 心理科学, 2018, 41(5): 1185-1191. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20180524. Dai YR, Li YM. The psychological effects of residential mobility: from the perspective of changes in social environment[J]. Journal of Psychological Science, 2018, 41(5): 1185-1191. DOI: 10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20180524.
[7]	孙晓红, 韩布新. 国内外流动儿童青少年心理健康状况研究: 基于CiteSpace的可视化分析[J]. 中国青年研究, 2018, (12): 67-73. DOI: 10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2018.0196. Sun XH, Han BX. Mental health status of migrant adolescents: visualization analysis based on CiteSpace[J]. China Youth Study, 2018, (12): 67-73. DOI: 10.19633/j.cnki.11-2579/d.2018.0196.
[8]	Fowler PJ, Henry DB, Marcal KE. Family and housing instability: longitudinal impact on adolescent emotional and behavioral well-being[J]. Soc Sci Res, 2015, 53(5): 364-374. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2015.06.012.
[9]	Flouri E, Mavroveli S, Midouhas E. Residential mobility, neighbourhood deprivation and children's behaviour in the UK[J]. Health Place, 2013, 20(2): 25-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.12.002.
[10]	Eisenberg N, Spinrad TL, Eggum ND. Emotion-related self-regulation and its relation to children's maladjustment[J]. Annu Rev Clin Psychol, 2009, 6(6): 495-525. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131208.
[11]	Susukida R, Mojtabai R, Murcia G, et al. Residential mobility and risk of major depressive episode among adolescents in the National Survey on Drug Use and Health[J]. J Public Health, 2015, 38(3): 432-440. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdv100.
[12]	Coley RL, Kull M. Cumulative, timing-specific, and interactive models of residential mobility and children's cognitive and psychosocial skills[J]. Child Dev, 2016, 87(4): 1204-1220. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12535.
[13]	赵燕, 张翔, 杜建政, 等. 流动儿童社会支持与抑郁及孤独的关系: 心理韧性的调节和中介效应[J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 2014, 22(3): 512-516. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2014.03.077. Zhao Y, Zhang X, Du JZ, et al. Relationship between social support and depression, loneliness of migrant children: resilience as a moderator and mediator[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2014, 22(3): 512-516. DOI: 10.16128/j.cnki.1005-3611.2014.03.077.
[14]	Windle, Gill. What is resilience? A review and concept analysis[J]. Rev Clin Gerontol, 2011, 21(2): 152-169. DOI: 10.1017/S0959259810000420.
[15]	蔺秀云, 方晓义, 刘杨, 等. 流动儿童歧视知觉与心理健康水平的关系及其心理机制[J]. 心理学报, 2009, 41(10): 967-979. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2009.00967. Lin XY, Fang XY, Liu Y, et al. The effect mechanism of stigma perception on mental health among migrant children in Beijing[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2009, 41(10): 967-979. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2009.00967.