The status of knowledge, attitude and practice about coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic among university students and its influencing factors
-
摘要:
目的 了解新型冠状病毒肺炎(coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19)流行期间中国大学生的知识、态度及行为现状, 为高校开展科学防控及公共卫生精准决策提供理论依据。 方法 2020年1月31日―2月5日, 选取4所高校共计56 997名大学生为研究对象, 采用32条目自编结构化调查问卷对大学生开展线上现况调查。 结果 共收集到44 456名大学生的调查问卷, 应答率为78.0%(44 456/56 997)。94.1%大学生认为COVID-19能通过与无症状感染者接触感染, 知晓主要传播途径和临床表现者达76.4%~98.9%, 但知晓预后情况者仅占52.9%。53.0%的大学生认为疫情严峻, 出现恐慌和焦虑的大学生占28.5%。采取规范洗手、佩戴口罩、减少外出和聚会等防护行为的大学生占86.9%~94.2%。亚组分析结果显示, 女性、高年龄组、教育程度高者及城市大学生知识和行为水平较高(均有P < 0.05)。 结论 本次COVID-19疫情期间, 大学生认识、态度和行为评分较高, 但知识缺口依然存在, 部分大学生出现恐慌和焦虑情绪。因此, 应针对大学生防疫意识薄弱点进行精准健康宣教。 Abstract:Objective To understand the knowledge, attitude and practice of Chinese university students during the epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19), so as to provide a theoretical basis for scientific prevention and control and accurate decision-making of public health in universities. Methods From January 31 to February 5, 2020, a total of 56 997 university students from four universities were selected to participate in the survey. A 32-item structured questionnaire was used to carry out an online survey. Results A total of 44 456 questionnaires were collected and the response rate was 78.0%(44 456/56 997). Among the university students, 94.1% of them believed that COVID-19 could be infected through contact with asymptomatic infected cases, and 76.4%-98.9% of them knew the main mode of transmission and clinical manifestations, but only 52.9% knew the prognosis of COVID-19. And 53.0% of them thought the epidemic was serious, and 28.5% students experienced panic and anxiety. The proportion of university students who adopt protective behaviors such as washing hands, wearing masks, and reducing going out and gathering ranged from 86.9% to 94.2%. Subgroup analysis results showed that the knowledge and practice levels among females, older age groups, those with higher education levels and urban university students were higher(allP < 0.05). Conclusions During the epidemic of COVID-19, university students scored highly in knowledge, attitude and practice, but the knowledge gap still existed, and some university students experienced panic and anxiety. Therefore, accurate health education should be carried out according to the weak point of epidemic prevention awareness among university students. -
Key words:
- Coronavirus disease 2019 /
- University students /
- Knowledge /
- Attitude /
- Practice
-
表 1 研究对象基本特征[n(%)]
Table 1. Basic characteristics of the respondents[n(%)]
特征 合计 暴露组 未暴露组 χ2值 P值 年龄(岁) 334.45 < 0.001 15~ 39 213 (88.2) 1 620 (75.8) 37 593 (88.8) ≥24 5 239 (11.8) 518 (24.2) 4 721 (11.2) 性别 0.42 0.518 男 20 220 (45.5) 958 (44.8) 19 262 (45.5) 女 24 232 (54.5) 1 180 (55.2) 23 052 (54.5) 民族 75.62 < 0.001 汉族 43 188 (97.2) 2 012 (94.1) 41 176 (97.3) 少数民族 1 264 (2.8) 126 (5.9) 1 138 (2.7) 文化程度 696.00 < 0.001 本专科 39 728 (89.4) 1 544 (72.2) 38 184 (90.2) 研究生 4 724 (10.6) 594 (27.8) 4 130 (9.8) 假期居住地 0.13 0.716 城市 28 320 (63.7) 1 370 (64.1) 26 950 (63.7) 农村 16 132 (36.3) 768 (35.9) 15 364 (36.3) 健康状况 183.45 < 0.001 健康 38 152 (85.8) 1 623 (75.9) 36 529 (86.3) 一般 6 116 (13.8) 496 (23.2) 5 620 (13.3) 不健康 184 (0.4) 19 (0.9) 165 (0.4) 合计 44 452 (100.0) 2 138 (100.0) 42 314 (100.0) - - 表 2 研究对象新型冠状病毒肺炎知信行总得分情况(x±s)
Table 2. Total score of knowledge, attitudes and practices with COVID-19 among the respondents (x±s)
维度 暴露组 非暴露组 合计 t值 P值 知识 12.85±1.79 12.66±1.76 12.67±1.76 4.64 < 0.001 态度 3.70±1.05 3.59±1.09 3.59±1.09 4.49 < 0.001 行为 8.85±1.80 8.93±1.68 8.92±1.69 -1.97 0.048 总得分 25.40±3.24 25.18±3.02 25.19±3.04 3.20 0.001 表 3 研究对象新型冠状病毒肺炎知信行得分多因素Logistic回归分析
Table 3. Multiple Logistic regression analysis of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices score with COVID-19 among the respondents
特征 知识得分不合格 OR (95% CI)值 P值 态度得分不合格 OR (95% CI)值 P值 行为得分不合格 OR (95% CI)值 P值 知信行得分不合格 OR (95% CI)值 P值 年龄(岁) 15~ 6 217 (30.8) 1.00 14 005 (35.7) 1.00 13 827 (35.3) 1.00 15 385 (39.2) 1.00 ≥24 5 572 (23.0) 0.81 (0.72~0.91) < 0.001 1 241 (23.7) 0.76 (0.69~0.85) < 0.001 1 363 (26.0) 0.85 (0.77~0.95) 0.002 1 102 (21.0) 0.74 (0.66~0.82) < 0.001 性别 男 11 035 (28.1) 1.00 7 528 (37.2) 1.00 7 951 (39.3) 1.00 8 931 (44.2) 1.00 女 754 (14.4) 0.67 (0.64~0.70) < 0.001 7 718 (31.9) 0.78 (0.75~0.81) < 0.001 7 239 (29.9) 0.65 (0.62~0.68) < 0.001 7 556 (31.2) 0.56 (0.54~0.59) < 0.001 文化程度 本专科 11 271 (28.4) 1.00 14 197 (35.7) 1.00 14 065 (35.4) 1.00 15 683 (39.5) 1.00 研究生 518 (11.0) 0.37 (0.33~0.43) < 0.001 1 049 (22.2) 0.56 (0.50~0.62) < 0.001 1 125 (23.8) 0.57 (0.51~0.63) < 0.001 804 (17.0) 0.36 (0.32~0.41) < 0.001 假期居住地 城市 7 106 (25.1) 1.00 9 772 (34.5) 1.00 9 399 (33.2) 1.00 10 076 (35.6) 1.00 农村 4 683 (29.0) 1.22 (1.16~1.27) < 0.001 5 474 (33.9) 0.97 (0.93~1.01) 0.154 5 791 (35.9) 1.12 (1.08~1.17) < 0.001 6 411 (39.7) 1.19 (1.14~1.24) < 0.001 健康状况 健康 10 407 (27.3) 1.00 12 826 (33.6) 1.00 12 776 (33.5) 1.00 14 188 (37.2) 1.00 一般 1 321 (21.6) 0.97 (0.91~1.04) 0.385 2 333 (38.2) 1.53 (1.45~1.63) < 0.001 2 313 (37.8) 1.50 (1.41~1.59) < 0.001 2 202 (36.0) 1.34 (1.26~1.43) < 0.001 不健康 61 (33.2) 1.29 (0.94~1.76) 0.110 87 (47.3) 1.75 (1.31~2.35) 0.068 101 (54.9) 2.39 (1.78~3.20) < 0.001 97 (52.7) 1.85 (1.38~2.49) < 0.001 注:多因素Logistic回归模型纳入了年龄、性别、民族、文化程度、假期居住地和健康状况。 -
[1] WHO. Statement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations(2005)Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus(2019-nCoV)[EB/OL]. (2020-01-23)[2020-04-18]. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/23-01-2020-statement-on-the-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov). [2] Gorbalenya AE. Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-The species and its viruses, a statement of the Coronavirus Study Group[J]. bioRxiv, 2020.DOI: 10.1101/2020.02.07.937862. [3] WHO. Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)situation report[EB/OL]. (2020-03-15)[2020-04-18]. https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/situation-reports/20200315-sitrep-55-covid-19.pdf?sfvrsn=33daa5cb_8(accessed Mar 15,2020). [4] 中华预防医学会新型冠状病毒肺炎防控专家组.新型冠状病毒肺炎流行病学特征的最新认识[J].中华流行病学杂志, 2020, 41(2): 139-144.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2020.02.002.Special Expert Group for Control of the Epidemic of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia of the Chinese Preventive Medicine Association. An update on the epidemiological characteristics of novel coronavirus pneumonia(COVID-19)[J]. Chin J Epidemiol, 2020, 41(2): 139-144. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2020.02.002. [5] Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 382(8): 727-733.DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017. [6] Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, et al. Genomic characterization and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10224): 565-574.DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8. [7] Chen L, Liu W, Zhang Q, et al. RNA based mNGS approach identifies a novel human coronavirus from two individual pneumonia cases in 2019 Wuhan outbreak[J]. Emerg Microbes Infect, 2020, 9(1): 313-319.DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1725399. [8] Wu A, Peng Y, Huang B, et al. Genome composition and divergence of the novel coronavirus(2019-nCoV)originating in China[J]. Cell Host Microbe, 2020, 27(3): 325-328.DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.02.001. [9] Shi H, Han X, Zheng C. Evolution of CT manifestations in a patient recovered from 2019 novel coronavirus(2019-nCoV)pneumonia in Wuhan, China[J]. Radiology, 2020, 295(1): 20.DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020200269. [10] Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10223): 497-506.DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [11] Chan JFW, Yuan S, Kok KH, et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10223): 514-523.DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30154-9. [12] Chen N, Zhou M, Dong X, et al. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10223): 507-513.DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30211-7. [13] Wang M, Cao R, Zhang L, et al. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus(2019-nCoV)in vitro[J]. Cell Res, 2020, 30(3): 269-271.DOI: 10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0. [14] Russell CD, Millar JE, Baillie JK. Clinical evidence does not support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10223): 473-475.DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30317-2. [15] Smith HL. On the limited utility of KAP-style survey data in the practical epidemiology of AIDS, with reference to the AIDS epidemic in Chile[J].Health Transit Rev, 1993, 3(1):1-16. [16] 黄韵芝, 张兴伟, 肖颖, 等.大学生新型冠状病毒知识、防护技能与压力应激反应的调查研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志, 2020: 1-10.Huang YZ, Zhang XW, Xiao Y, et al. Knowledge, prevention skills and stress response status of novel coronavirus pneumonia among university students[J]. China Journal of Health Psychology, 2020: 1-10. [17] Kobayashi M, Beer KD, Bjork A, et al. Community knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding ebolavirus disease-five counties, Liberia, September-October, 2014[J].MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 2015, 64(26):714-718. [18] Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10223): 497-506.DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30183-5. [19] Chan JF, Yuan S, Kok KH, et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: a study of a family cluster[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395(10223): 514-523DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30154-9. [20] Rotenstein LS, Ramos MA, Torre M, et al. Prevalence of depression, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation among medical students: asystematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. JAMA, 2016, 316(21): 2214-2236.DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.17324.