Advanced Search

CN 34-1304/RISSN 1674-3679

Volume 27 Issue 8
Aug.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
MU Yutong, GUO Yang, LI Qing, ZHANG Miao, SUO Chen, LI Yaxin, LIU Haiyan, HU Anqun, ZHENG Yingjie. Random sampling: a causal perspective[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2023, 27(8): 989-992. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2023.08.020
Citation: MU Yutong, GUO Yang, LI Qing, ZHANG Miao, SUO Chen, LI Yaxin, LIU Haiyan, HU Anqun, ZHENG Yingjie. Random sampling: a causal perspective[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2023, 27(8): 989-992. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2023.08.020

Random sampling: a causal perspective

doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2023.08.020
Funds:

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82173582

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81373065

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81773490

More Information
  • This article explained the structure and principle of simple random sampling, cluster sampling, and stratification sampling from the perspective of causal graphs. The process of generation and adjustment of sampling bias was clearly presented. We found that: when the target attribute of the study was related to other attributes which affected the selection of the samples, the representative of the sample would be biased. In other words, the sampling bias or the systematic error of sampling would appear. When selecting sampling methods, cluster sampling requires heterogeneity within clusters but homogeneity among clusters. In contrast, stratified sampling requires the opposite way. Finally, this paper provides a route for the selection of sampling methods in practical research work, which can help readers to improve the acknowledgment of random sampling and consider the best sampling method.
  • loading
  • [1]
    Acharya AS, Prakash A, Saxena P, et al. Sampling: why and how of it?[J]. Indian J Med Spec, 2013, 4(2): 330-333. DOI: 10.7713/ijms.2013.0032.
    [2]
    Jun SJ, Lee S. Causal inference under outcome-based sampling with monotonicity assumptions[M]. arXiv preprint, 2020: 1-169.
    [3]
    Gabriel EE, Sachs MC, Sjölander A. Causal bounds for outcome-dependent sampling in observational studies[J]. J Am Stat Assoc, 2020, 117(538): 939-950. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1832502.
    [4]
    Hernan MA, Robins JM. Causal Inference: What If[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2020: 1-389.
    [5]
    Pearl J. Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2009: 1-477.
    [6]
    郑英杰, 赵耐青. 有向无环图: 语言、规则及应用[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2017, 38(8): 1140-1144. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2018.01.019.

    Zheng YJ, Zhao NQ. Directed acyclic graphs: languages, rules and applications[J]. Chin J Epidemiol, 2017, 38(8): 1140-1144. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2018.01.019.
    [7]
    Cochran WG. Sampling techniques[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1977: 1-11.
    [8]
    Kish L. Survey Sampling[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1965: 1-29.
    [9]
    Neyman J. Contribution to the theory of sampling human populations[J]. J Am Stat Assoc, 1938, 33(201): 101-116. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1938.10503378.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (243) PDF downloads(31) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return