The relationship between different types of daily living abilities and depression among older adults
-
摘要:
目的 了解中国老年人抑郁及日常生活能力现状,并分析两者的联系。 方法 选取2018年7月10日—9月13日中国健康与养老追踪调查中60岁及以上老年人,运用χ2检验和logistic回归分析模型探索日常生活能力对老年人抑郁的影响。 结果 中国老年人抑郁检出率为43.82%;基本日常生活自理能力(basic activity of daily living, BADL)受损率为8.78%;工具性日常生活自理能力(instrumental activity of daily living, IADL)受损率为25.82%。BADL(OR=1.621, 95% CI: 1.304~2.016, P < 0.001)、IADL(OR=1.520, 95% CI: 1.321~1.748, P < 0.001)受损老年人抑郁可能性较高。IADL受损对不同地域老年人抑郁皆有影响,而BADL受损对中部地域老年人抑郁作用不明显。 结论 日常生活能力受损老年人抑郁的可能性较高。建议将心理健康服务融入失能老年人的照护体系,配置相应的养老资源时注重地域差异。 Abstract:Objective This study seeks to understand the current situation of depression and the level of daily living abilities in China′s elderly population, and to analyze their interconnection. Methods We selected individuals aged 60 years and above from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study between 10th July to 13th September in 2018. Chi-square test and logistic regression models were used to explore the effect of daily living ability on depression among the elderly. Results Our study revealed that 43.82% of Chinese elders experienced symptoms of depression. Furthermore, the rates of impaired basic activities of daily living (BADL) and impaired instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) were 8.78% and 25.82%, respectively. Elderly individuals with impaired BADL (OR=1.621, 95% CI: 1.304-2.016, P < 0.001) and IADL (OR=1.520, 95% CI: 1.321-1.748, P < 0.001) demonstrated a higher propensity towards depression. Notably, IADL impairment influenced depression rates among the elderly across various regions, whereas BADL impairment showed no discernible effect on depression rates in middle-aged seniors. Conclusions Declining daily living abilities increase the likelihood of depression among the elderly. Accordingly, attention should be paid to the mental health status of elderly groups with disabilities, and regional disparities should be considered when allocating resources for senior care. -
Key words:
- Elderly /
- Depression /
- Activities of daily living /
- Influence factors
-
表 1 不同特征老年人抑郁检出率比较
Table 1. Comparison of the detection rate of depression in the elderly with different characteristics
变量 总体①(n=5 894) 抑郁人数①(n=2 583) χ2值 P值 变量 总体①(n=5 894) 抑郁人数①(n=2 583) χ2值 P值 地区 94.901 < 0.001 慢性病 60.590 < 0.001 东部 1 973(33.47) 703(27.22) 有 3 039(51.56) 1 103(42.70) 中部 1 988(33.73) 895(34.65) 无 2 855(48.44) 1 480(57.30) 西部 1 933(32.80) 985(38.13) 自评健康 525.959 < 0.001 性别 82.329 < 0.001 好 935(15.86) 224(8.67) 男 2 746(46.58) 1 031(39.91) 一般 2 877(48.81) 1 047(40.53) 女 3 148(53.42) 1 552(60.09) 差 2 082(35.33) 1 312(50.80) 年龄/岁 6.771 0.035 BADL状况 127.941 < 0.001 60~<70 3 745(63.54) 1 664(64.42) 受损 518(8.78) 349(13.51) 70~<80 1 763(29.91) 774(29.97) 完好 5 376(91.22) 2 234(86.49) ≥80 386(6.55) 145(5.61) IADL状况 241.343 < 0.001 教育程度 113.013 < 0.001 受损 1 522(25.82) 926(35.85) 小学及以下 4 376(74.25) 2 092(80.99) 完好 4 372(74.18) 1 657(64.15) 初中 1 106(18.76) 374(14.48) 社交活动 22.668 < 0.001 高中及以上 412(6.99) 117(4.53) 有 2 936(49.81) 1 196(46.30) 婚姻状况 25.322 < 0.001 无 2 958(50.19) 1 387(53.70) 在婚 4 787(81.22) 2 023(78.32) 夜间睡眠/h 151.165 < 0.001 非在婚 1 107(18.78) 560(21.68) < 7 3 619(61.40) 1 814(70.23) 居住地 98.336 < 0.001 ≥7 2 275(38.60) 769(29.77) 农村 4 201(71.28) 2 012(77.89) 与子女居住 3.334 0.068 城镇 1 693(28.72) 571(22.11) 有 1 301(22.07) 599(23.19) 个人年收入/元 158.095 < 0.001 无 4 593(77.93) 1 984(76.81) < 10 000 3 482(59.08) 1 707(66.09) 10 000~ < 20 000 1 154(19.58) 517(20.01) ≥20 000 1 258(21.34) 359(13.90) 注:1. BADL:基本日常生活自理能力。2. IADL:工具性日常生活自理能力。
①使用[人数(占比/%)]表示。表 2 不同地域不同类型ADL状况老年人抑郁检出率比较
Table 2. Comparison of the detection rate of depression in the elderly with different types of ADL in different regions
变量 例数 BADL χ2值 P值 IADL χ2值 P值 完好者抑郁 受损者抑郁 完好者抑郁 受损者抑郁 地区 东部 1 973 33.53(614/1 831) 62.68(89/142) 48.797 < 0.001 30.76(479/1 557) 53.85(224/416) 76.259 < 0.001 中部 1 988 42.87(767/1 789) 64.32(128/199) 33.284 < 0.001 38.55(552/1 432) 61.69(343/556) 86.664 < 0.001 西部 1 933 48.57(853/1 756) 74.58(132/177) 43.494 < 0.001 45.26(626/1 383) 65.27(359/550) 63.040 < 0.001 合计 5 894 41.56(2 234/5 376) 67.37(349/518) 127.941 < 0.001 37.90(1 657/4 372) 60.84(926/1 522) 241.343 < 0.001 注:1. ADL:日常生活能力。2. BADL:基本日常生活自理能力。3. IADL:工具性日常生活自理能力。 表 3 不同ADL受损状况对老年人抑郁影响的回归分析
Table 3. Regression analysis of the influence of different ADL impairment statuses on the depression among the elderly
变量 值 sx Wald值 OR值(95% CI) P值 变量 β值 sx Wald值 OR值(95% CI) P值 模型1 ① 模型4 ④ BADL受损 0.660 0.104 40.259 1.935(1.578~2.373) < 0.001 东部 IADL受损 0.797 0.065 152.636 2.220(1.956~2.519) < 0.001 BADL受损 0.645 0.208 9.639 1.906(1.269~2.865) 0.002 模型2 ② IADL受损 0.502 0.131 14.558 1.652(1.276~2.137) < 0.001 BADL受损 0.483 0.111 18.877 1.621(1.304~2.016) < 0.001 中部 IADL受损 0.418 0.071 34.247 1.520(1.321~1.748) < 0.001 BADL受损 0.308 0.177 3.040 1.361(0.963~1.923) 0.081 模型3 ③ IADL受损 0.403 0.121 11.053 1.496(1.180~1.896) 0.001 BADL地域 -0.033 0.125 0.069 0.968(0757~1.237) 0.793 西部 IADL地域 -0.075 0.077 0.946 0.928(0.798~1.079) 0.331 BADL受损 0.582 0.199 8.523 1.788(1.207~2.649) 0.004 IADL受损 0.356 0.119 8.935 1.422(1.122~1.803) 0.003 注:1. ADL:日常生活能力。2. BADL:基本日常生活自理能力。3. IADL:工具性日常生活自理能力。
①仅含BADL、IADL变量。②调整人口学特征、健康状况及健康行为。③表示地区与BADL和IADL的交互作用。④地区分层+模型2的结果。 -
[1] 刘宏军, 王淳秀, 关绍晨, 等. 北京地区老年人抑郁症状筛查检出率及影响因素的横断面调查[J]. 中华保健医学杂志, 2019, 21(3): 207-211. DOI: 10.3969/.issn.1674-3245.2019.03.005.Liu HJ, Wang CX, Guan SC, et al. Cross-sectional survey on the screening rate of depressive symptoms and related risk factors in the elderly in Beijing[J]. Chin J Health Care Med, 2019, 21(3): 207-211. DOI: 10.3969/.issn.1674-3245.2019.03.005. [2] Yu J, Li J, Cuijpers P, et al. Prevalence and correlates of depressive symptoms in Chinese older adults: a population-based study[J]. Int J Geriatr Psych, 2012, 27(3): 305-312. DOI: 10.1002/gps.2721. [3] Zhao Y, Hu Y, Smith JP, et al. Cohort profile: the China health and retirement longitudinal study (CHARLS)[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 2014, 43(1): 61-68. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dys203. [4] 孙丹丹, 孙朵朵, 索靖东, 等. 抑郁在老年人社会参与和认知功能间的中介作用[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2022, 26(2): 212-217. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2022.02.015.Sun DD, Sun DD, Suo JD, et al. The mediating role of depression in the relationship between social engagement and cognitive function in older persons[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2022, 26(2): 212-217. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2022.02.015. [5] 张文娟, 魏蒙. 中国老年人的失能水平到底有多高?-多个数据来源的比较[J]. 人口研究, 2015, 39(3): 34-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RKYZ201503003.htmZhang WJ, Wei M. Disability level of the Chinese elderly: comparison from multiple data sources[J]. Popul Res, 2015, 39(3): 34-47. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-RKYZ201503003.htm [6] 李甘, 郭雁飞, 黄哲宙, 等. 中国50岁及以上人群社会参与度和抑郁的关联研究[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2020, 24(4): 399-403. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2020.04.006.Li G, Guo YF, Huang ZZ, et al. Social engagement and depression among Chinese aged 50 years and older[J]. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2020, 24(4): 399-403. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2020.04.006. [7] 杜娟, 钱晨光, 徐薇, 等. 北京市某城区失能老人家庭照顾者的抑郁情绪现况调查[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2014, 28(7): 506-511. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2014.07.005.Du J, Qian CG, Xu W, et al. Depressive symptoms in family caregivers of disabled elderly in Beijing urban[J]. Chin Mental Health J, 2014, 28(7): 506-511. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2014.07.005. [8] Ormel J, Rijsdijk FV, Sullivan M, et al. Temporal and reciprocal relationship between IADL/ADL disability and depressive symptoms in late life[J]. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 2002, 57(4): 338-347. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/57.4.338. [9] 胡明月, 熊大艳, 胡恒瑜, 等. 45岁及以上人群抑郁对日常活动能力影响的meta分析[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2020, 34(5): 416-422. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2020.5.006.Hu MY, Xiong DY, Hu HY, et al. A meta-analysis of effect of depression on activities of daily living among people aged 45 years and over[J]. Chin Mental Health J, 2020, 34(5): 416-422. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2020.5.006. [10] Sone T, Nakaya N, Tomata Y, et al. Functional disability among partners and community activity in elderly Japanese: The Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study[J]. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2018, 78: 150-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.06.007. [11] 魏蒙, 王红漫. 中国老年人失能轨迹的性别、城乡及队列差异[J]. 人口与发展, 2017, 23(5): 74-81, 98. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1668.2017.05.008.Wei M, Wang HM. The gender, urban and rural areas, cohort differences of disability trajectory of the elderly in China[J]. Popul Dev, 2017, 23(5): 74-81, 98. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1668.2017.05.008. [12] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会. 2019中国卫生健康统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国协和医科大学出版社, 2019: 240-241.National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China. 2019 China Health Statistical Yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Union Medical College Press, 2019: 240-241. [13] 杨付英, 郝晓宁, 薄涛, 等. 我国老年人失能现状及其影响因素分析-基于CHARLS数据的实证分析[J]. 卫生经济研究, 2016, (11): 7-10. DOI: 10.14055/j.cnki.33-1056/f.20161103.019.Yang FY, Hao XN, Bo T, et al. Disability status and its influencing factors of the elderly in China-an empirical study based on CHARLS data[J]. Health Econ Res, 2016, (11): 7-10. DOI: 10.14055/j.cnki.33-1056/f.20161103.019. [14] 陈娜, 王长青. 老年人口日常生活自理能力城乡差异研究-基于CLHLS(2014)数据的实证分析[J]. 人口与发展, 2021, 27(1): 135-144, 123. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2019.09.065.Chen N, Wang CQ. A study on urban-rural differences in self-care ability of the elderly population-empirical analysis based on CLHLS (2014) data[J]. Popul Dev, 2021, 27(1): 135-144, 123. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2019.09.065. [15] Gong F, Zhao D, Zhao Y, et al. The factors associated with geriatric depression in rural China: stratified by household structure[J]. Psychol Health Med, 2018, 23(5): 593-603. DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2017.1400671.