Universality of nurse-nurse collaboration scale in Chinese clinical nurses

SHI Juan; SONG Gui-qi; SONG Yong-xia; QI Yong-zha; WANG Wei-li

doi:10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.05.019

Volume 20 Issue 5

May 2016

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION > 2016 > 20(5): 508-511

SHI Juan, SONG Gui-qi, SONG Yong-xia, QI Yong-zha, WANG Wei-li. Universality of nurse-nurse collaboration scale in Chinese clinical nurses[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2016, 20(5): 508-511. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.05.019

Citation:

SHI Juan, SONG Gui-qi, SONG Yong-xia, QI Yong-zha, WANG Wei-li. Universality of nurse-nurse collaboration scale in Chinese clinical nurses[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2016, 20(5): 508-511. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.05.019

Citation:

PDF( 944 KB)

Universality of nurse-nurse collaboration scale in Chinese clinical nurses

doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2016.05.019

1. Department of Nursing, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230601, China;
2. Department of Nursing, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei 230001, China;
3. International Union Research Center of nursing science in Anhui Province, Hefei 230601, China

Received Date: 2015-11-19
Rev Recd Date: 2016-01-14

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To explore the universality of nurse-nurse collaboration scale in Chinese clinical nurses. Methods The NNCS was translated according to Brislin principle and adapted according to Chinese culture. The universality of Chinese version of NNCS was tested among 574 clinical nurses in Hefei city. SPSS 13.0 software and AMOS 17.0 software were used to analyze data and then final Chinese version of NNCS was formed. Results The Chinese version of NNCS was consisted of 25 items in 4 dimensions. The Cronbach's α for the over scale was 0.93 and the content validity index was 0.98. Four factors were extracted which contributed 57.97% of the total variance. First-confirmatory factor analysis and second-confirmatory factor analysis showed: χ²/df =2.33/2.55, GFI=0.92/0.92, AGFI=0.90/0.90, RMSEA=0.05/0.05, RMR=0.02/0.05, NFI=0.93/0.92, CFI=0.96/0.95, TLI=0.95/0.94. Conclusions The Chinese version of NNCS is reliable and valid, and can be used to assess the status of collaboration among clinical nurses in China.
- Nurses,
- Questionnaires,
- Evaluation studies as topic

FullText(HTML)

References(13)

References

Longo J, Hain D. Bullying: a hidden threat to patient safety [J]. Nephrol Nurs J, 2014,41(2):193-199.

Goffman D, Brodman M, Friedman AJ, et al. Improved obstetric safety through programmatic collaboration [J]. J Healthc Risk Manag, 2014,33(3):14-22.

Dougherty MB, Larson EL. The nurse-nurse collaboration scale [J]. J Nurs Adm, 2010,40(1):17-25.

贾晓彤,杨辉. 中文版护护合作量表信效度检验 [J]. 护理学杂志, 2014,29(10):58-61.

Jones PS, Lee JW, Phillips LR, et al. An adaptation of Brislin's translation model for cross-cultural research [J]. Nurs Res, 2001,50(5):300-304.

张宜民. 城市公立医疗机构医生工作满意度、职业倦怠与离职意向关系的模型研究 [D]. 上海:复旦大学, 2011.

Waltz CF, Strickland OL, Lenz ER. Measurement in nursing and health research [M]. New York:springer Pub, 2010:50-62.

徒文静,徐桂华. 中文版炎性肠病自我效能量表的信效度研究 [J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2014,30(22):18-21.

吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务SPSS操作与应用 [M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2010:158-192,237-265

,217.

陈静,张贤,张振香,等. 医护合作量表的汉化及信效度检验 [J]. 中华护理杂志, 2014,49(2):236-240.

冼君定,谭健烽,万崇华,等. WHOQOL-BREF量表用于精神分裂症和抑郁症的信效度研究 [J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2015,19(5):500-503.

Msil CM, Jones SL, Warner CD. Structural equation modeling and its relationship to multiple regression and factor analysis [J]. Res Nurs Health, 1998,21(3):271-281.

吴明隆. 结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用 [M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2010:213-290.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Proportional views