XU Hao-feng, MENG Rui-lin, ZHU Xu-hao, ZHOU Zhi-shan, XU Yan-jun, ZHU Yong-jian, LIN Li-feng, XU Xiao-jun. A study on the evaluation index system for water bodies for childhood drowning in rural area[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2017, 21(10): 1018-1021. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2017.10.012
Citation:
XU Hao-feng, MENG Rui-lin, ZHU Xu-hao, ZHOU Zhi-shan, XU Yan-jun, ZHU Yong-jian, LIN Li-feng, XU Xiao-jun. A study on the evaluation index system for water bodies for childhood drowning in rural area[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2017, 21(10): 1018-1021. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2017.10.012
XU Hao-feng, MENG Rui-lin, ZHU Xu-hao, ZHOU Zhi-shan, XU Yan-jun, ZHU Yong-jian, LIN Li-feng, XU Xiao-jun. A study on the evaluation index system for water bodies for childhood drowning in rural area[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2017, 21(10): 1018-1021. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2017.10.012
Citation:
XU Hao-feng, MENG Rui-lin, ZHU Xu-hao, ZHOU Zhi-shan, XU Yan-jun, ZHU Yong-jian, LIN Li-feng, XU Xiao-jun. A study on the evaluation index system for water bodies for childhood drowning in rural area[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2017, 21(10): 1018-1021. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2017.10.012
1. Institute of Control and Prevention for Chronic Non-infective Disease, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 511430, China;
2. Department of Control and Prevention for Chronic Non-infective Disease, Qingyuan City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Qingyuan 511515, China;
3. Department of Control and Prevention for Chronic Non-infective Disease, Qingxin District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Qingyuan 511500, China
Objective To construct a scientific and reasonable evaluation index system for water bodies for childhood drowning in rural area. Methods The dimensions of the indicator system was determined based on the survey of water bodies. A 3-round Delphi process was conducted. The weight of index was calculated by method of proportionate allocation. Results The index system including 7 first-class indicators and 25 second-class indicators was developed in according to three rounds of Delphi consultations by 15 specialists. The response rate of three rounds was 100%, 93.3% and 100%, respectively. The specialist authority coefficient was 0.79. The W for each class of indicator was 0.862, 0.705, 0.823 and 0.696, respectively(all P<0.01). The CV for each indicator ranged from 0.00 to 0.20. Conclusions The index system established in the study has good reliability and feasibility.
DownLoad: