Comparison of comprehensive evaluation poor eyesight effects of RSR, improved TOPSIS and fuzzy combination method

BAO Xin-yu; YANG Di; WANG Jia-qi; ZHU Li-ling

doi:10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2020.11.022

Volume 24 Issue 11

Dec. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION > 2020 > 24(11): 1356-1360

BAO Xin-yu, YANG Di, WANG Jia-qi, ZHU Li-ling. Comparison of comprehensive evaluation poor eyesight effects of RSR, improved TOPSIS and fuzzy combination method[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2020, 24(11): 1356-1360. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2020.11.022

Citation:

BAO Xin-yu, YANG Di, WANG Jia-qi, ZHU Li-ling. Comparison of comprehensive evaluation poor eyesight effects of RSR, improved TOPSIS and fuzzy combination method[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2020, 24(11): 1356-1360. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2020.11.022

Citation:

PDF( 887 KB)

Comparison of comprehensive evaluation poor eyesight effects of RSR, improved TOPSIS and fuzzy combination method

doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2020.11.022

1.
Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 161400, China
2.
Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 161400, China

Funds:

Commission of Heilongjiang Province Health Research Projects 2019-286

More Information

Corresponding author: ZHU Li-ling, E-mail:18045451675@163.com
Received Date: 2020-01-01
Rev Recd Date: 2020-09-14
Publish Date: 2020-11-10

Abstract

Abstract

Objective A comprehensive evaluation of the poor eyesight of some minority students was carried out based on rank-sum ratio (RSR), improved technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) and fuzzy combination method, and the comprehensive evaluation effects of three methods were compared. Methods RSR, improved TOPSIS and fuzzy combination method were used to comprehensively evaluate the poor eyesight of some minority students based on the data of physique and health survey reports of Chinese students in 2014. Results The last five of poor vision levels were Bourau, Qiang and Salar under three analytical methods, and the results were relatively stable. Under RSR method, Tu nationality was the 23th, the result of grading was the first (poor), and the results were respectively the 16th, 23rd, 21st and 19th under improved TOPSIS and fuzzy combination method of three kinds of weight. Under improved TOPSIS method, Korean was the last, that RSR method and three kinds of weight were the 17th, 19th, 22nd and 24th, respectively. Conclusions RSR method does not fully utilize the data, and improved TOPSIS method is susceptible to extreme values, fuzzy combination method can complement the advantages of the two methods. According to the principle of majority, the results were selected with the same overall trend. Furthermore, fuzzy combination method possesses higher sensitivity and thereby is more suitable to evaluate the distribution of poor eyesight.
- RSR,
- Improved TOPSIS,
- Fuzzy combination,
- Comprehensive evaluation

FullText(HTML)

References(10)

References

[1]	祝丽玲, 孟繁君, 杜宁.秩和比法综合评价2015年我国孕产妇保健状况[J].中华疾病控制杂志, 2018, 22(8):859-861. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2018.08.025. Zhu LL, Meng FJ, DuN. Comprehensive evaluation of maternal health situation in China in 2015 by rank sum ratio method[J]. Chin J Dis Control Pre, 2018, 22(8):859-861. DOI: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2018.08.025.
[2]	孙振球.医学综合评价方法及其应用[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2006:53-54. Sun ZQ. Research on comprehensive evaluation methods and its application in medical science[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2006:53-54.
[3]	刘桂芬.医学统计学[M].第2版.北京:中国协和医科大学出版社, 2007:336-337. Liu GF. Medical statistics[M]. second. Beijing: Peking Union Medical College Press, 2007:336-337.
[4]	王一任.综合评价方法若干问题研究及其医学应用[D].长沙: 中南大学公共卫生学院, 2012. Wang YR. Research on a few issues of comprehensive evaluation methods and its application in medical science[D]. Changsha: School of Public Health, Central South University, 2012.
[5]	范炤. TOPSIS法与秩和比法模糊联合对卫生事业管理质量的综合评价[J].中国医院统计, 2000, 7(4):214-216. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JTYY200004007.htm Fan Z. A comprehensive evaluation of health management quality by using the fuzzy combined method of TOPSIS and Rank Sum Ratio[J]. Chinese Journal of Hospital Statistics, 2000, 7(4):214-216. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-JTYY200004007.htm
[6]	李云, 杭惠, 惠东明, 等.秩和比法在传染病疫情网络直报报告质量评价中的应用[J].中华疾病控制杂志, 2007, 11(5):524-525. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3679.2007.05.024. Li Y, Hang H, Hui DM, et al. Application of RSR in quality evaluation of communicable diseases internet-based reporting[J]. Chin J Dis Control Pre, 2007, 11(5):524-525. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3679.2007.05.024.
[7]	Wang M, Fang H, Bishwajit G, et al. Evaluation of rural primary health care in western China: a cross-sectional study[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2015, 12(11):13843-13860. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph121113843.
[8]	孙振球, 王乐三.综合评价方法及其医学应用[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2014:3547, 5260. Sun ZQ, Wang LS. Research on comprehensive evaluation methods and its application in medical science[M]. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House, 2014:3547, 5260.
[9]	何长思, 赵大仁, 孙渤星, 等.基于Topsis和RSR法模糊联合的医疗联合体实效评价[J].中国医院管理, 2016, 36(5):77-79. http://www.cnki.com.cn/article/cjfdtotal-yygl201605005.htm He CS, Zhao DR, Sun BX, et al. An effectiveness analysis of the medical association by TOPSIS and RSR with the fuzzy combined method in Chengdu[J]. Chin Hosp Manage, 2016, 36(5):77-79. http://www.cnki.com.cn/article/cjfdtotal-yygl201605005.htm
[10]	郭文燕, 梅文华, 方国伦. TOPSIS法和RSR法模糊联合对某医院运行管理情况的综合评价[J].中国卫生统计, 2018, 35(5):729-732. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/94022X/20185/676634871.html Guo WY, Mei WH, Fang GL. A comprehensive evaluation of operational management of hospital based on the RSR, improved TOPSIS and fuzzy combination method[J]. Chin J Health Statistics, 2018, 35(5):729-732. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/94022X/20185/676634871.html