WAN Li-hong, ZHANG Xiao-pei, PAN Jun-hao, MO Miao-miao, XIONG Xiao-ni, LU Yu-wei, CHEN Shao-xian. The reliability and validity of short form health belief model scale for stroke patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2017, 21(3): 303-307. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2017.03.021
Citation:
WAN Li-hong, ZHANG Xiao-pei, PAN Jun-hao, MO Miao-miao, XIONG Xiao-ni, LU Yu-wei, CHEN Shao-xian. The reliability and validity of short form health belief model scale for stroke patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2017, 21(3): 303-307. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2017.03.021
WAN Li-hong, ZHANG Xiao-pei, PAN Jun-hao, MO Miao-miao, XIONG Xiao-ni, LU Yu-wei, CHEN Shao-xian. The reliability and validity of short form health belief model scale for stroke patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2017, 21(3): 303-307. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2017.03.021
Citation:
WAN Li-hong, ZHANG Xiao-pei, PAN Jun-hao, MO Miao-miao, XIONG Xiao-ni, LU Yu-wei, CHEN Shao-xian. The reliability and validity of short form health belief model scale for stroke patients[J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION, 2017, 21(3): 303-307. doi: 10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2017.03.021
Objective To simplify the Chinese version of the champion health belief model scale (CHBMS). Methods The Chinese version of CHBMS was revised using item analysis and expert consultation methods. A total of 235 stroke patients were recruited and investigated with short form health belief model scale (SF-HBMS). SPSS 17.0 and Mplus 7.0 software were used to test the reliability and validity. Results The item-level content validity index(I-CVI)was 0.97. The Sale-CVI/ universal agreement (S-CVI/UA) was 0.85. The Sale-CVI/average (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.97. The Cronbach's α was 0.835. The split-half reliability was 0.779. The test-retest reliability was 0.811. The confirmatory factor analysis was performed to test the construct validity. The χ2/ df was 1.642. The comparative fit index (CFI) was 0.939. The tucker-lewis index (TLI) was 0.926. The standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) was 0.062; the root mean square error of approximation(RMSEA)was 0.052, P=0.361, which all demonstrated that six dimensions and their items were all consistent and fitted with its theoretical structure. The criterion-related validity was 0.956. It could distinguish the difference of health belief among patients with different educational level (t=-2.282,P=0.023) and had desired discriminative validity. Conclusions The SF-HBMS has satisfactory reliability and validity, and can be used to assess the level of health belief for stroke patients.